I’m frequently requested things i do as a living. Like a trainer and consultant in the area of software testing, I must explain the area and exercise of software testing in certain creative ways, for example:
I help people discover bugs in software prior to it going to you.
I’m a “test pilot” for software.
I’m just like a software bug exterminator.
I’m also able to indicate recent news, like the failure from the Obamacare website and say, “I attempt to assist companies avoid this sort of problem.”
This is actually the Worldwide Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB) definition: “The procedure composed of existence cycle activities, both static and dynamic, worried about planning, preparation and look at software products and related work products to find out they satisfy specified needs, to show that they’re fit for purpose and also to identify defects.”
In fact, software tests are also system testing, as you have hardware to check software.
The interesting factor in my experience concerning the ISTQB definition is it describes a procedure occurring within a software project. However, like a customer of software, you can look at the program you need to buy before you purchase it.
For instance, if you wish to purchase a personal finance application, you are able to download trial versions of numerous products and find out which meets your requirements best. This is exactly what is intended when you are “fit for purpose.” Possibly all of the applications you attempt are functionally correct, however, many might be too complex or too simple.
Many people see software testing as the entire process of finding defects (or bugs).
However, I would recommend the finest worth of software tests are to supply details about software, for example defects, performance, usability, security, along with other areas.
A different way to see software tests are “qc” for software. As with manufacturing in which the QC people search for defects in products, software testers search for defects inside a software product.
Regrettably, too couple of organizations and companies begin to see the value to software quality, so that they release buggy software for their customers. These defects cost time, money and result in many frustration. Just consider the final time you possessed a software problem. Possibly your word processing software crashed when you were writing something and also you lost the final fifteen minutes of writing. That’s frustrating.
In business, software defects have caused individuals to die, as well as for immeasureable money to become lost. Within the Facebook IPO, Nasdaq has already established to pay for over $80 million up to now in fines and restitution to investors. Which was because of one software defect (not really a glitch), that caused a never-ending loop condition.